Foucault nietzsche genealogy history essay - …

Most pieces collected between these covers were simply maddening, to be honest. I read everything at least twice. I was not looking for a distilled Foucault. My purpose wasn't to form a conceptual whole, a sweeping theory. No, totalizing wasn't on my agenda. Finding coherence was. I remain in the camp of anti-essentialist investigation, that hasn't changed. I highly recommend two essays in the book: What Is an Author and Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. The others served best to baffle and dishearten. I just told my wife that self-awareness is often a certain agent of depression. So it goes.

In the essay Nietzsche, Genealogy, History, Foucault expands ..

in his essay, “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History,” Foucault ..
Photo provided by
Flickr

How can the answer be improved?

A remarkable collection of essays and lectures all of which revolve around the subject of language. For Foucault, Discourse represents a context within which power relations exist. The two most noted essays in this collection are 'What is an Author?' and 'Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.'It is in the latter that one can discern the enormous impact that Nietzsche has made on Foucault's archaeological project. He engages in a discussion on the nature of history as it relates to power relations and truth. Foucault writes: "The successes of history belong to those who had used them, to disguise themselves so as to pervert them, invert their meaning, and redirect them against those who had initially imposed them; controlling this complex mechanism, they will make it function so as to overcome the rulers through their own rules" (151).

Nietzsche, Genealogy, History - Denver, Colorado

(2) 'Counter-Memory: The Philosophy of Difference' - as the section title suggests, this section in part explores Foucault's links with Deleuze. His famous essay - 'What is an Author?' - opens this section, in short, where Foucault claims that the author is a function of discourse. Further, one of Foucault's best essays 'Nietzsche, Genealogy, History' - which followed a sustained period where Foucault taught on Nietzsche; this essay serves as one of his best statements of his interpretation of the genealogical method. The final paper in this is the expansive and vast 'Theatrum Philosophicum' - a combined rich review of Deleuze's 'Difference and Repetition' and 'The Logic of Sense' - where Foucault enthusiastically surveys and critiques Deleuze's philosophy of difference.

MICHEL FOUCAULT'S "NIETZSCHE, GENEALOGY, HISTORY" A SYNOPSIS This is a synopsis of Michel Foucault's essay prepared for my students in ENGL 4F70. I apologize for any errors or misrepresentations. The pagination refers to the volume The Foucault Reader ed. Paul Rabinow SECTION 2: WHY NIETZSCHE
Photo provided by
Flickr

Department of English Languages and Literature - Courses

The article introduces Michel Foucault's essay "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History." In this essay, Foucault was said to have executed Friedrich Nietzsche's call for a study of other histories of one's daily life by writing about madness, sexuality and punishment. It is said that Foucault's...

Britannica does not currently have an article on this topic.

As Foucault discussed in his essay "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History", Foucault's ideas of genealogy were greatly influenced by the work that Nietzsche had done on the development of morals through power. Foucault also describes genealogy as a particular investigation into those elements which "we tend to feel [are] without history". This would include things such as sexuality, and other elements of everyday life. Genealogy is not the search for origins, and is not the construction of a linear development. Instead it seeks to show the plural and sometimes contradictory past that reveals traces of the influence that power has had on truth.

Foucault – Nietzsche, Genealogy, History | lewis …

Throughout "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History," Foucault's reliance on quotations from Nietzsche playfully dramatizes the dissociation of his own identity. The historical method he calls "genealogy" turns out to be built with materials borrowed from a nineteenth-century philosopher's critique of historians. So it would hardly have surprised Foucault that this essay's argument against metaphors of continuity has some connection to nineteenth-century ideas. But the connection may be stronger and broader than the essay recognizes, because the passages that Foucault borrows from Nietzsche are in fact quite typical of a certain late-nineteenth-century discourse about history. Nietzsche may criticize the aspirations of "scientific" historians, but he does so in large part by embracing another use of the past that already dominated histories of literature and art. The decentered immortality that Nietzsche attributes to the man of "superior culture"—who preserves in his own body fragments of a vanished past—closely resembles the immortality that Walter Pater, for instance, famously attributed to La Gioconda: